{{ currentBoardShortName }}
  • Markets
  • Indices
  • FX
  • Energy
  • Metals
  • Live
Markets
As of: {{timeStamp.date}}
{{timeStamp.time}}

Markets

{{ currentBoardShortName }}
  • Markets
  • Indices
  • FX
  • Energy
  • Metals
  • Live
{{data.symbol | reutersRICLabelFormat:group.RICS}}
 
{{data.netChng | number: 4 }}
{{data.netChng | number: 2 }}
{{data | displayCurrencySymbol}} {{data.price | number: 4 }}
{{data.price | number: 2 }}
{{data.symbol | reutersRICLabelFormat:group.RICS}}
 
{{data.netChng | number: 4 }}
{{data.netChng | number: 2 }}
{{data | displayCurrencySymbol}} {{data.price | number: 4 }}
{{data.price | number: 2 }}
  • BREAKING NEWS

    TESLA TO ISSUE AND SELL US$20M OF STOCK TO ELON MUSK

Latest Videos

{{ currentStream.Name }}

Related Video

Continuous Play:
ON OFF

The information you requested is not available at this time, please check back again soon.

More Video

Jun 13, 2018

Chip Wilson blasts Lululemon board for being ‘scared’ of analysts

Lululemon founder Chip Wilson

Security Not Found

The stock symbol {{StockChart.Ric}} does not exist

See Full Stock Page »

Chip Wilson is taking aim at Lululemon – again.

In an article published Wednesday in online publication Retail Insider, the Lululemon founder – and also the company’s largest shareholder – criticized its board for being at the mercy of analysts.  

“I suspect that Lululemon does not have the courage nor the vision to lower margin and reflect the natural shift to a lower-cost but more profitable ecommerce model. Why? Because uninformed analysts would panic over short-term lower margins and guide investors away from the stock,” Wilson wrote.

“If the analysts are scared, then so is the Lululemon board, even though their mandate is to drive long-term value,” he added.  

This isn’t the first time Wilson has chastised the yoga wear retailer or its analysts. In a June 2016 interview on BNN Bloomberg, Wilson called the retailer a “C-level” student and said it was losing its leadership position in the industry.

He reiterated that sentiment in Wednesday’s article, saying the company has lost ground against its rivals “due to lack of reinvestment” and argued it’s “worth billions less than its potential.” 

“Nonetheless, it still has the best business model if a perfect combination of ecommerce and brick-and-mortar plays out,” Wilson wrote.   

Wilson also said the company is “five years late” in its global expansion efforts, but its Vancouver headquarters is in an “optimal” location since the city is flooded with athletes and expatriates from Europe and Asia with global experience and “a distinct sense of style.”

“Unfortunately for Lululemon, the board tends to overlook these resources, instead preferring to hire fashion and wholesale executives from the very companies lululemon does not want to be,” Wilson wrote.

Looking forward, Wilson said Lululemon’s biggest opportunity is to take advantage of high vacancy rates to renegotiate its leases at a discount.  

“With these savings, Lululemon can continue to make brick-and-mortar super profitable and drive [the] brand like no other athletic company,” Wilson wrote.

In spite of Wilson’s ongoing criticisms, Lululemon’s sales accelerated faster than expected in its latest quarter, helped by booming e-commerce orders. Lululemon’s shares rallied the most in almost 10 months on the earnings report.

The company continues to search for a chief executive after Laurent Potdevin left in February amid allegations of unprofessional behaviour.